Firemen, Police and Teachers, Oh My!!!

rush-limbaugh

“As nice as they are to have, teaching jobs, fireman, policeman, they are all paid for with money out of the private sector. They are paid for with tax revenue from citizens. They cut into the amount of money left for private sector jobs, they don’t grow the number of private sector jobs, they reduce them. Now, I’ve gotta to be very careful here because no one is against teachers or fireman or cops, but those are public sector jobs.”

“They aren’t private sector jobs, they do not contribute to economic growth. Their purpose is otherwise. They have an entirely different purpose. Public safety, public education, but there’s no growth in the economy if you add those jobs. If there aren’t other types of private sector jobs added, while at the same time were adding to the fire rolls, the cop rolls and the teachers, we are reducing the size of the private sector. This is Marxism 101.”

These are two quotes from Rush Limbaugh.   These comments were made during the recent run up to Election 2012.

Now, I have a couple of questions:
1.  If we hire teachers, police and firemen, do we not pay them?

2.  If we hire teachers, police and firemen, do we not provide them with equipment?

The government will purchase vehicles, firearms, radios and other equipment.  Does this not contribute to the economy?  Do these people not serve a purpose in ensuring that the economy of the United States drives on.  Firemen keep fires from spreading and destroying homes, businesses, etc.  Police serve as a deterrent to crime and to indirectly protect private and commercial property.  They also keep the peace to a degree.

Though, it is a given that the police do cross the line at times and serve to disturb the peace nearly as much as they keep the peace.  Especially when they are utilized by  Politicians as jackbooted thugs which seems to be growing all too common these days.

Teachers serve or at least many attempt to produce intelligent citizens who can enter the job market and contribute to the economy.  This is arguable at times as many teachers are as worthless as teats on a boar hog but, for the most part, teachers serve their purpose and pump out young adults who do enter the job market and are, for the most part, literate.  Though this effort is stifled by outdated notions of job security for even the most inefficient scum who suck off of the government parasitically while producing nothing in the way of improvement in the minds of our youth.

With all of that in mind, each of these positions do, in fact, contribute to the economic growth of the nation.  Yet, they simultaneously curb the private sectors ability to introduce funds into the economy.  Where would those funds better serve the economy?  That could be debated endlessly.

Rush Limbaugh, as usual, is wrong and only running his mouth with the hyperbolic fervor that has made him a millionaire.  That is, after all, his goal.  Talk loud, spin everything, keep empty heads nodding and spending money to support him and his personal economy.

Has there ever been a greater moron with a greater following of foolish sheep in the history of radio/cable TV?  I don’t know.  Maybe Glenn Beck gave him competition.  The morons at Huff Post give the Dittoheads a good run for their money.

Rush-Limbaugh-funny-idiot

Rush Limbaugh is another of those partisan hacks whom I find to be so treasonous.  He’s as dangerous a character as any James Wilkerson or Benedict Arnold in American History.  He does more damage than good by keeping the nation divided and unfocused on real issues or, more importantly, solutions.  He’s simply a tool of the partisans of the GOP.

The fat bastard should be deported to Saudi Arabia where he can serve as the mouthpiece for Islamic lunacy and the Saudi Oil interests.

The Right of Secession

https://i0.wp.com/www.irregulartimes.com/secedeamerica.jpg

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

Do we all agree with this?

If so, how can anyone say that secession is illegal?

If secession [dissolution of political bands] is a right of Natural Law, the Federal Government acted unlawfully in upholding the Union in the War Between the States.

If such is the case, how can some hold the leaders of the Secessionist Movement aka the Confederate States of America as anything less than patriots?

It’s right there in the Declaration of Independence. Either it’s correct or the DOI is null and void from the beginning and we had no right to secede from the British Empire.

I’m assuming that you, the reader, are familiar with the Declaration of Independence. Therein lies the right/legal avenue for leaving the Union. It states clearly in that most fundamental of founding documents that “political bands” can and should be dissolved when the State/Compact/Federal Gov’t is longer working for the good of the people. All of the people or some of the people. It matters not which.

Read it again:

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

There it is in fairly plain English. Having read that, how is it possible that some declare that there is no legal avenue or no right to secede. Secession is an act upon which this country was founded. The[se] United States of America are/were born out of the clear and divine right to secede from an undesirable Union.

We have forced nations to accede to secession of minorities and other groups. We forced Czechs to allow Germans to return to Germany. We forced those same Germans earlier to leave the German Union and join the Czechs. We forced the Ottomans to allow groups to secede. We forced Poland, Germany, Korea, Vietnam, China and others to allow secessionist groups to depart from their sovereignty after World War II. We are forcing Israel to allow the Palestinians to secede from Israel. Many International Groups are attempting to force China to allow Tibet to secede even though China’s claim to Tibet goes all the way back to Khans Jingghis and Kubalai.

Whole parts of the Soviet Union seceded from that Union and we supported it and pressured Russia to allow it. The Balkans is a horror story of secession.

We created Panama by forcing it’s secession from it’s Union with Nicaragua.

India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, the various territories over which these three tribes fight are a story of secession from a Union that lasted centuries.

We took territories from Mexico. We took territories from Spain. Those were acts of lawful and unlawful sanctioned acts of secession and accession by THESE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

How can one say that there is no legal basis for secession when it has been the norm for Nation States since before the Fall of Rome which was one continuous act of secession that lasted for two or three centuries.

Secession is in the Bible. The Tribes of Judaea were a Confederacy which broke apart. That was a “Biblical” Act of Secession.

Secession is a right of natural law. According to our most cherished founding document. It is the act upon which the Founding Fathers laid the foundation of the Republic. How, then, can it be illegal?

https://i2.wp.com/futureisnow.wikispaces.com/file/view/DeclarationIndependence.jpg/177957637/DeclarationIndependence.jpg