The Liberals Who Cried Racism!

phpthumb_generated

Racism is the default defense mechanism of the Left.

This is one reason that I did not want a Hillary Clinton Presidency. There would have been zero room for criticism of the Queen of Chaos.

If Hillary had been elected and caused World War III, any criticism leveled at Hillary would have been met with accusations of misogyny. It had already started during the Democratic Primaries. The “Bernie Bros” all hated women according to the Hillary Echo Chamber.

The Left cannot help themselves. They cannot take criticism. They believe themselves to be incapable of mistakes. Any and all criticism must most assuredly come from a place of hate for a persons race, gender or sex.

If the Democrats ran a Muslim for POTUS, he could enact an executive order mandating that all women wear the hijab. Anyone who objected would be branded an Islamophobe.

Advertisements

Fear and the State

 

Hayat Boumeddiene 'appears in Islamic State film' - 06 Feb 2015

Do these ISIS “Terrorists” look Arab to you?

To understand the average human, you must look inwards.

See your fear and understand what you fear.

They have fear as well. They simply fear something different.

Add State and non-State actors such as Hillary and Trump, Fox News, Rachel Maddow, Bill Oh Really and the moronic chimps on The View amongst others and the fear mongering which acts as a nuclear charge…there you have it.

People fear. Others prey upon that fear.

In America, those who are most susceptible to the fear mongering are those who do not inform themselves instead relying upon Political Operatives and Mainstream News Sources which have been subverted since, at least, the 1950s to do just that — INDUCE FEAR.

Fear creates passivity and acquiescence.

OH DEAR, STATE! PLEASE SAVE US FROM THE GREAT BOOGIE MEN WHICH THOU HAST SET BEFORE US!

terorThe Great Boogie Men of the Last Century

download-2

Norway ~ The Great White Hype

cover_may_2013_450_600_90_s_c1_center_center_0_0_1

The Left goes on and on complaining about White People, Old White men, White this and White that…

They bitch about ‪#‎WhitePrivilege‬.

They tell us all of our problems were and are created by White people.

Coz Whitey is BEE–AY–DEE…BAD!!!

Then…

They turn right around and tell us that we should be more like Norway.

Norway is one of the Whitest fucking Nations on the Whole Motherfucking Planet.

Up to and possibly exceeding 90% Crackerdom.

Another Nation mentioned is Iceland. It is also over 90% Cracker.

So, mayhap, you Lefties and LibDems are just a bunch of racist bastards afterall.

Why aren’t you pointing to all of the great success stories on the African Continent? You racist sumbitches!

 

 

Democratic Party Being Liberal Hillary Clinton Bernie Sanders

The Sins of White Guilt Liberals & Corrupt Black Politicians

PLEASE STOP HELPING US: HOW LIBERALS MAKE IT HARDER FOR BLACKS TO SUCCEED
By Jason L. Riley
Encounter, $23.99, 184 pages

Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. famously said we are a “nation of cowards” when it comes to discussing race. Jason Riley is not one of them. The Wall Street Journal editorial board member’s new book, “Please Stop Helping Us: How Liberals Make It Harder for Blacks to Succeed,” is a moment of clarity in a tempest of confusion over the impact of social-welfare policy on blacks, particularly in light of recent commemorations of the 50th anniversary of the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

Well meaning White Liberals need to get the fuck out of the way and let Black people solve their own problems.

Corrupt Black Politicians such as Barack Obama, Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson and Eric Holder need to get out of the way and stop hindering Black progress.

All of the idiots paving the way to hell with their good intentions need to shut the fuck up and take their own path to hell.

People will amaze you with their ingenuity and their capability if only well meaning morons would simply get the fuck out of the way.

9_3_2014_please-stop-helping8201_s877x1302

Navajo_Code_Talkers4

American Military Tradition and the Native American (American Indian)

Navajo_Code_Talkers4

 

Why do we name our battles and weapons after people we have vanquished? For the same reason the Washington team is the Redskins and my hometown Red Sox go to Cleveland to play the Indians and to Atlanta to play the Braves: because the myth of the worthy native adversary is more palatable than the reality — the conquered tribes of this land were not rivals but victims, cheated and impossibly outgunned. . . .  It is worse than denial; it is propaganda. . . .  In whatever measure it is tribute to the dead, it is in greater measure a boost to our national sense of superiority.

A moron named Simon Waxman wrote this incredibly ignorant piece (some say Onion Worthy) for the Boston Review.  It shows a complete lack of context and historical knowledge.  It’s also insulting to the many Native Americans who have been a part of the American Military Tradition since before the founding of the United States of America.

My first reaction to this article was to ask; “What loser wrote this nonsense?”

My second thought was to wonder if the Navajo would feel the same way as this White Boy.  White Boy?  Well, yes, Simon Waxman is a White Boy.  Another in a long line of Great White Fathers who feels entitled to tell the natives of the North American continent how they should feel and act and respond to all things connected to the Great European Invasion.

The natives of this land were conquerors.  I hesitate to call them aboriginal peoples as no one knows to whom exactly that title would apply.  The peoples who inhabited the Americas at the time of the Euro invasions did not simply appear out of the ether and the mysts eons ago only to be invaded by evil Whitey from Europe.  No, they traveled far distances, thousands of miles to arrive here as well.  There are traces of other civilizations spread throughout North America.  From ancient Chinese writings cave walls out West to Welsh speaking tribes in the East.  There are also ruins found along the Missouri and Mississippi rivers which oddly resemble Roman military fortifications.  There is evidence that African peoples traveled to the Americas and settled.  There is also speculation and some evidence that the Phoenicians traveled to the Americas and left settlements thousands of years ago.

The Apaches were simply one of the latest warriors tribe known to the Americas and extant when the young American Empire decided to expand or to “Go West, young man!”   The Apaches happened to be one of the more vicious of the Western tribes.  They displaced peoples only to later be displaced by Europeans.  These warriors conquered others. The Commanche was another such tribe as were the Sioux.  There were no native tribes in the Americas who had not at one time or another been ascendant and in that process of ascendancy who did not displace, conquer and kill.

Black Hawk was a military leader. He led a band of Indians against the early American settlers of the West. He also displaced other Indians. He and his forebears conquered. His tribe did not materialize out of the ether and mysts on their lands in the beginnings of time when the world was young and violence was yet to be invented either.

Do Liberals not understand, comprehend or have any knowledge of history.  I am inclined to believe that they must not actually develop a real knowledge base. They read only articles and books about victimization.  They subsist on a steady diet of “victimology.”  I pray that there comes not a day when Liberals believe me to be imperiled.  I would not wish their pernicious evil to be thrust upon the memories of my peoples — the individualists, the iconoclasts, the folks who simply do not want to be bothered by Liberal guilt (or their brothers the conservative right).

There is not a group of peoples who have not conquered others. Not one.  This does not exist.  These innocents do not exist.

I know of no group of pacifist people who have lived completely at peace with those around them since the beginning of time.  Pacifists themselves cannot exist as a sole group.  They would be conquered immediately.  Pacifism is a parasitic philosophy as it can only exist within a group that has members who are willing to actually fight.

Lastly, the “Native Americans” are part of America. Like it or not, for better or worse. Indians have served in our military and with our military since the beginning. Indians serve now. The American Indian has always been an integral part of the human culture and warrior tradition of the United States Military. Yes, the American Military is heir to the legends, warrior culture and traditions of the American Indian.

Simon Waxman, I think, has never sat down and conversed with a “Native American.”  He is another in a long line of “Great White Fathers” who wishes to speak for the poor red man of the Americas.  These White boys irk the hell out of me.

Mitchell_Red_Cloud

America’s Greatest Criminals aka Political Parties

Image

 

Criticism of one political party is not approval of the other. Neither is approval of one effort, program, legislative act or idea consent to, approval of, validation of, endorsement of nor support for either political party in any way, shape or form. I wish Americans and, especially, Democrats and Republicans could comprehend this.

Any time I say anything about one party, the other comes rushing in to defend or criticize the other.

Often times, the every day person is unaware of his parties history and true actions versus their rhetoric.

I’ll state this again: I THINK BOTH PARTIES ARE CRIMINAL!

No real difference between political parties whether you want to discuss the National Socialist of Germany, the Bolsheviks, Menshevists Russian, Christian Democratic Party of Germany, Socialist Party of America, the KKK, The Black Panthers, Hamas, Fatah, Likud, Kadima, Jamiat-e Islamic, the the GOP or the DNC.

Each and every one of them will do anything to win and to stay in power.

Each has lied to start wars and each has caused the murder of hundreds of thousands to millions AND each are supported by Corporations and assorted other terroristic, criminal organizations.

If it is a corporate backed political party it has been corrupted by profit and greed driven CEOs and Bankers. It is not worth human effort and definitely not worthy of trust.

Image

Abolish Incumbency

Abolish Incumbency

#Idiot America

Congress is universally hated, disregarded, abhorred, disrespected. Congress has our disdain. They’re earned no respect.

Yet, we send these criminals back term after term.

Are the American people just plain stupid?

We Disapprove…but fuck it! Let’s re-elect the criminals anyway!

Ideological Tolerance and Acceptance

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

I have a few hard line stances to which I am pretty much a hard stay.

Most people are cool with the difference of opinion.

Two groups who, ironically, preach tolerance/love/acceptance have been the ones most often and most likely to hold these opinions against me.

1. Fundamentalist Christians
2. Hard Left Liberals

I have a few people who hold a hardcore dislike for me or who love to “preach” their message but do everything that they can to NOT hear any other message.

All of these people fall into the category of Fundamentalist Christian or Hard Left Liberal.

For instance, I do not think that Palestine will ever be “democratic.”  Yet, there are a group of liberals whom I have known who attend rallies, meetings and such with the goal of a “free and democratic” Palestine.  When I tell them that this is impossible, they automatically think that I am for the status quo in Palestine and that I am pro everything Israel.  However, that could not be further from the truth.

I believe that Israel is the author of many of the woes of Palestine.  I believe that Israel has become an offensive fraud who preaches democracy, yet, oppresses a whole class of people based upon fear and greed.

I, also, believe that the Arab Nations share guilt in this endless conflict.  All of the Arabs.  Iraq, Saudi Arabia (most guilty and most hypocritical), Syria, Iran, Lebanon, Egypt, Sudan, Jordan and Palestine.  These people are as great a problem and sticking point as the Israelis.

That said, no Palestinian State that emerges at this time will be democratic.  It will be another Islamic Despotism based on the rule of the Muslim Brotherhood.  Liberal fallacies and fantasies about freedom and democracy in the region are naught but dreamy intentions paving the way to hell for Arab Christians and Muslims in Palestine.

I also have my Fundie Christian detractors.  Those purveyors of hellfire and brimstone who “innocently” imply that I am on the path to hell and can’t quite understand how such a belief would offend anyone.   These people have told me countless times that morality can not exist without Christianity.  For them, there is no morality without Christ.

I, on the other hand, look at the history of Christianity and think that if that is morality, I’d rather be immoral.

When I refute their claims, they claim that I am blaspheming their religion.  They tell me that I am disrespecting their beliefs.  They tell me that I should be more tolerant.

That bewilders me.  The thought that I should be “tolerant” of a belief that condemns me to hell.  The idea that I should be more respectful of a religion that believes that I will burn for eternity because I do not pay lip service or believe in their system of intellectual and emotional servitude to a capricious deity who on the one hand orders genocide and on the other preaches faith, hope and love BUT only if you believe in him, his son and their plan for salvation.

If I deign not to believe, I shall burn in hell for eternity.

And I’m the disrespectful, intolerant one?

Inconceivable.

Yet, that I have the audacity to make it clear that I think Palestinian Democracy or Salvation at the hands of a vengeful, judgmental God or whatever pet project a Fundamentalist Christian or Hard Left Liberal might have is based on fallacy, I am the intolerant one.

These folks are absolutist.  There is no room for difference with these folks.  I will admit that I might be wrong.  I fully and freely admit that I do not know all.

But there is no room for doubt with these folks.  Therefore, I become the enemy.  The hated one.

They preach.  They give their story.  They’ll demand that you listen, that you give them your time.  When you attempt to give your side, they will not listen.  Their minds close as tightly as their eyes, ears and hearts.

And then I become the evil one.

Tolerance?  Acceptance?

For most of these people, these are mere tools with which they bash the opponent.  You are required to tolerate and accept their ideas.  They require that you dismiss yours.

Saudi Clerics say drink your Neighbors Breast Milk (Breast Milk Sibling “Custom”)

https://i1.wp.com/feministing.com/imageStorage/saudirape.jpeg

Saudi Clerics Advocate Adult Breast-Feeding

(June 5) — Women in Saudi Arabia should give their breast milk to male colleagues and acquaintances in order to avoid breaking strict Islamic law forbidding mixing between the sexes, two powerful Saudi clerics have said. They are at odds, however, over precisely how the milk should be conveyed.
A fatwa issued recently about adult breast-feeding to establish “maternal relations” and preclude the possibility of sexual contact has resulted in a week’s worth of newspaper headlines in Saudi Arabia. Some have found the debate so bizarre that they’re calling for stricter regulations about how and when fatwas should be issued.
Sheikh Al Obeikan, an adviser to the royal court and consultant to the Ministry of Justice, set off a firestorm of controversy recently when he said on TV that women who come into regular contact with men who aren’t related to them ought to give them their breast milk so they will be considered relatives.
“The man should take the milk, but not directly from the breast of the woman,” Al Obeikan said, according to Gulf News. “He should drink it and then becomes a relative of the family, a fact that allows him to come in contact with the women without breaking Islam’s rules about mixing.”
Obeikan said the fatwa applied to men who live in the same house or come into contact with women on a regular basis, except for drivers.
Al Obeikan, who made the statement after being asked on TV about a 2007 fatwa issued by an Egyptian scholar about adult breast-feeding, said that the breast milk ought to be pumped out and given to men in a glass.
But his remarks were followed by an announcement by another high-profile sheik, Abi Ishaq Al Huwaini, who said that men should suckle the breast milk directly from a woman’s breast.
Shortly after the two sheiks weighed in on the matter, a bus driver in the country’s Eastern Region reportedly told one of the female teachers whom he drives regularly that he wanted to suckle milk from her breast. The teacher has threaten to file a lawsuit against him.

The fatwa stems from the tenets of the strict Wahhabi version of Islam that governs modern Saudi Arabia and forbids women from mixing with men who are not relatives. They are also not allowed to vote, drive or even leave the country without the consent of a male “guardian.”

Under Islamic law, women are encouraged to breast-feed their children until the age of 2. It is not uncommon for sisters, for example, to breast-feed their nephews so they and their daughters will not have to cover their faces in front of them later in life. The custom is called being a “breast milk sibling.”

In another bizarre fatwa (ruling) by the Wahhabi Clerics of that insane religion from the Nejd, a group of Saudi Clerics has stated that men who frequently interact with women from outside of their family should drink the breast milk of said women in order to become their “siblings.”

Why make rules or even follow the Qu’ran if they are going to go to such lengths to get around them.  The Saudi Kings and Princes [supposedly] follow Islam while they are in the Kingdom.  When they depart the sacred land of Arabia, these Princes do as they please.  The rules apparently only apply while they are on sacred Saudi soil.

I know that while I was in Kuwait several Filipino gals were kidnapped, raped, murdered and then deposited in the desert.  The desert tells no tales.  Another “custom” of these holy men of Arabia is to lure young Filipino and other Asian gals into one of the desert Kingdoms with the lure of employment.  Come to Kuwait or Saudi Arabia or one of the UAE countries to become a maid, an aux pair or run a restaurant.  Once the girls arrive, the sponsor takes her passport.  The first thing that takes place is that the girl is raped and beaten.  She no longer is in possession of her passport. This is in the possession of her sponsor.  She has no recourse.  She can’t complain to the police.  They’ll not believe her.  Especially as the rules of Sharee’ah are in force.  She needs witnesses.  If she claims rape, yet, has no witnesses, she’s guilty of adultery or fornication or crimes against chastity.  She’ll be judged against and punished harshly.  Up to and including beatings, canings, lashes and death.

I guess now, though, all they have to do is give up a little breast milk and their siblings.

Hey!  Then everything is A-OK.

Ain’t that grand.

And that’s Islam in a nutshell.

Patriarchal idiocy.

Utter nonsense.

Power in the name of religion, Allah, Mohammad.

Wahhabism.

The Wahhabis need to be ended.  Period.

Without Wahhabism, Islam could be a decent religion.  Possibly have a renaissance era that brings it into an era of peace and out of it’s essence of death, violence and war.

Any person in the West who is mad enough or stupid enough to justify or rationalize this lunacy should be deported and made to live in Saudi Arabia in the Nejd.

Air drop their ridiculous selves into the Nejd and let them fend for themselves.  That’s a perfect punishment for child molestors, rapists and murderers, too.  Hell, perhaps we could send our politicians there, too.  Let’s make Obama the first example of Islamic “Justice.”

Barack Obama, Moveon.org and the fall of Western Civilization

When nothing is worth fighting for…

Moveon.org and all it’s sibling movements out there are the surest sign of the apocalypse.

Not her child she says.  Not Alex.  Not a child of the Liberals who refuse to defend themselves against anyone.  The Soviets.  Terrorists.  It matters not.  I’m certain that the woman in this video will be more than willing to see other sons and daughters go off to war.  Just not her child.  That’s the problem with the Left and the Pacifists and all of those like them.  They must flee or they die.  The only societies in which it is possible to hold those ideals sacred are societies that have men and women standing at the ready to defend them.  A pacifist won’t defend himself or herself.  Thus it will always fall to others to defend these folks.  Pacifism and anti-War ideals are noble indeed.  It takes an army of fighting men and women to defend those ideals though.

War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things; the decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse. A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing he cares about more than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature who has no chance of being free, unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself.

John Stuart Mill

We make war that we may live in peace.

Aristotle