The DNC — Racist, Warmongering Scum Sponsored by Goldman Sachs

blog-crow-copy

What is up with the Democratic Party?

Every evil that is conceivable has been perpetrated by the Democrats.

Jim Crow
Slavery
Japanese Interment
The Trail of Tears
The Vietnam War
The Cold War
The United Nations

The Original Chickenhawks

I could go on and on.

Yet, now, they attempt to act innocent and they call the Republicans racist.

As if history did not exist.

Now, we have Obamacare & White Privilege.

We have Democrats attempting to tell us that the GOP is bought and paid for (IT IS) while pretending that they, the Left, are not owned by the same Goldman Sachs cabal.

Obama was against the war in Iraq until he made it his own by screwing up across the Middle East. Now, the Nobel laureate is in love with the War in Iraq. After all, Iraq War 3.0 is his own war. Of course, he loves it.

Obama invented Terror Tuesday where he votes THUMBS UP or THUMBS DOWN like a Roman Emperor in the Coliseum on whether to assassinate American Citizens or to drone the hell out of mostly random brown folks in Central Asia and the Middle East.

Meddling in the Middle East was a terrible crime under Bush. Bush was a war criminal. Obama has meddled ever more and in a much more corrupt, cronyistic and incompetent manner, yet, you are a racist if you question his war mongering across the Brown portion of the Planet.

Perhaps, some fuckin’ Democrat can explain this shit to me.

JimCrow

large

The DNC has murdered and rampaged its way across history and somehow blames it all on the GOP…and you are a racist.

The Black Vote in America. Do Black People Really Have a Choice?

6

The GOP attempts to limit minorities the vote through various shenanigans. They can’t outright deny minorities the vote. However, they can move towards requirement of IDs via legislation because, apparently, minorities are….hell, I don’t know…too stupid, too lazy, too complacent to get an ID of some sort. I don’t understand this as I’ve had some form of ID since I was 15.

The GOP works to limit minority voting not because of RACISM, but, because minorities vote heavily for the DNC.

The DNC attempts to limit minority voting choice in the election process. This is especially true of the Black Community. The DNC shames Black people and other minorities into voting Democrat. It does this through control of community centers and Black Churches.

Screen-Shot-2012-10-07-at-10.24.16-PM-620x388

Watch what happens when any Black person or other minority comes out of the closet as a Republican. The reactions of the Left is alway swift, loud and violent. UNCLE TOM! Pull that bitches Sistah Card! And worse. Stacey Dash was vilified so greatly by the DNC mouthpieces that I thought she must have assraped several toddlers. Nope…not that. She simply came out as a Republican.

The attacks on Allen West are the same.

No Black person is safe who comes off of the Democratic Plantation. A Black person who dares to go against the 50 plus years of Democratic Domination of the Black Vote is vilified. Not even ISIS or al Qaeda is attacked by the DNC with the same fervor as a Black Republican.

What you have here is a basic attempt to deny voting rights to minorities by both parties. One attempts to limit opportunity. The other attempts to limit choice. This amounts to the same. A Black person is expected to vote Democrat. A Black person who doesn’t vote Democrat is vilified, black listed and defamed such that they can find it dangerous to be amongst Black people.

I see no difference. The GOP doesn’t want Black people to vote because they know that 90% of Black people will vote Democrat. The DNC only wants them voting or to have a voice if they stay on the Democrat Plantation. If they don’t, the DNC wants to deny them both voice and vote.

How are Black people better off now than under Jim Crow? They changed the system, changed the vocals and optics but it amounts to the same.  Zero Choice for the majority of Black people.  Vote Republican at your own peril.

The GOP would prefer that you not vote if you are Black. The DNC demands that you vote Democrat if you are Black.  If you don’t, they’ll burn down your life.  It amounts to zero real representation as the Black Democratic vote is taken for granted and the Black Republican vote is not truly courted.

That’s freedom?

 

Erika_Harold

Not Stacey Dash. Erika Harold.

Liberal Tolerance of a Black Republican lol

Liberal Tolerance of a Black Republican lol

Image

Islamic Tolerance would, today, be called Apartheid

Islamic Tolerance would today be called Apartheid

“I call you to God and to Islam. If you respond to the call, then you are Muslims: You obtain the benefits they enjoy and take up the responsibilities they bear. If you refuse, then you must pay the jizyah. If you refuse the jizyah, I will bring against you tribes of people who are more eager for death than you are for life. We will then fight you until God decides between us and you.” (Al Tabari, Volume XI)

Khalid bin Al-Waheed (Muslim General, 632AD)

It is truthful to say that Islam has a proud tradition of tolerance.

Tolerance: the ability or willingness to tolerate something, in particular the existence of opinions or behavior that one does not necessarily agree with.

Tolerance is sometimes a first step towards elimination or assimilation. We can tolerate the influx of immigrants in the United States until (or only if) they assimilate. It’s the same with Islam.

Islam tolerates Christians and Jews (and whomever else) as long as they eventually assimilate. At the apex of Islamic Empire, this tolerance worked in their favor. They were THE World Power, especially in the Eastern Hemisphere, and those below them were of little consequence. Islamic law made it difficult to be an outsider or less difficult to revert (convert). Non-Muslims in Islamic lands were required to pay a special tax (jizya). No buildings were to be created or built that were for the purpose of worship or exercise of any other religion. Non-Muslims could ride on a horse in many (most) Muslim lands. Non-Muslims could not own Muslim slaves. Though Muslims could own Muslim slaves. Any non-Muslim in a Muslim country was characterized both culturally and legally as a dhimmi.

So, yes, Islam has a strong tradition of tolerance. At that point in Islamic history, tolerance worked in Islam’s favor. Let’s not confuse tolerance with true acceptance, though. Non-Muslims in the Islamic world were little better than second class citizens. In today’s parlance, the existence and lifestyle created by Islamic tolerance would be called Apartheid. Apparently, Mr. Obama believes that this is a thing to be tolerated when it exists in Islam.

In the modern age, most Islamic nations are small despotic, tyrannical States with no real power outside of their borders. Tolerance does not work. In order for Islam to survive, no other religion can be allowed to have influence over the people or the culture. Islam will not survive if people are allowed to make choices contrary to Islam.

Islamic civilization was definitely a tolerant society at one time. In some cases in some countries, it still is today. However, I hardly would call this Apartheid-like tolerance any better than Southern Jim Crow.

Summon the people to God; those who respond to your call, accept it from them, but those who refuse must pay the poll tax out of humiliation and lowliness. If they refuse this, it is the sword without leniency. Fear God with regard to what you have been entrusted. (Al Tabari, Volume XII)

Umar ibn al-Khattab during the conquest of al-Basrah (636 CE)