LGBT Will Never Be Normal!

Normal is an adjective. It means:
1. conforming to the standard or the common type; usual; not abnormal;regular; natural.
2. serving to establish a standard.
3. Psychology.

  1. approximately average in any psychological trait, as intelligence,personality, or emotional adjustment.
  2. free from any mental disorder; sane.

In order for LGBT to become “normal,” the majority of the humans on the globe would have to be Lesbian, Gay, Bi-Sexual or Transgender. The reality is that LGBT are a relative minority. I’ve read that LGBT are less than .01 percent of the World’s Human Population. Therefore, LGBT will never be normal.

All of this talk of making LGBT normal is ludicrous. It is ignorant and it is offensive. The statement behind that “mission” is that everyone except LGBT are abnormal. Non-LGBT are not abnormal. We’re just plain people. Some of my fellow “straight” humans do not like or do not accept or cannot tolerate LGBT humans. I do not understand this completely. However, I do understand how these folks can be and are upset when idiot politicians of the Left stand up and makes statements alluding to the “normality” of homosexuality. Usually, I take these idiot statements as a sign that said politician has no grasp of the English language. If English is, indeed, their native language. No minority is a norm.

European or “White” people aren’t a “norm” in the world. Humans of European descent are a relative minority in the world. We can’t make being “White” the norm any more than politicians can make LGBT a norm.

That said, there is a goal that is reachable. I’m not talking about tolerance. Tolerance is a lie. Tolerance is the Great White Lie of the American and European Political Left. To tolerate something or someone is to endure something or to permit something to happen or exist. Tolerance lends to the opinion that LGBT should be permitted to be themselves.

This is no goal. Does a human being endowed with all of the natural rights which humans are supposed to possess inherently need a “by your leave” permission slip from humanity to be themselves and to retain their natural rights? I think not. However, this is what the Political Left would have us believe. I defy this lunacy. I would spit in the eye of the despot who demanded that I seek permission to be who I am. I would hope that my fellow humans who are LGBT would feel the same. If not, ’tis too late. They have already lost themselves as has anyone who feels the need to seek permission to be themselves.

The goal should be acceptance. We should all accept others as they are and not as we would have them be. There are exceptions to this. A mass murderer should not be accepted (OBVIOUSLY). LGBT persons are no more abnormal than I. They simply are not the norm of humanity. They are different. They have different goals and desires. That said, they should not be treated as a dangerous anomaly.  They should be treated as fellow humans with all of the natural rights of their fellow humans. That is all. They should be accepted and allowed to forge their own path.

I may or may not agree with homosexuality. However, this is of no consequence. The actions of a homosexual or LGBT human that do not negative affect my natural rights are of no consequence to me. First do no harm. That is the rule by which we should all live and I can think of many, many more humans who do harm first before I would list an LGBT simply because they  happen to be an LGBT.

To accept something or someone is to reconcile oneself to that some one or thing. It is to come to an accommodation. It is to concede or admit formally. We should accept our fellow humans as they are. If needs be, we should accommodate them. As long as a fellow human means us no harm and poses no risk, why should we not accept them.

There is no risk posed by an LGBT that is not similarly posed by others. I know many people who pose risks to us who are not LGBT who are accepted with very little argumentation. Politicians are one such animal. If I am to accept Barack Obama as my President, I can see no reason that I should not accept that LGBT are simply my fellow humans and worthy of my respect and acceptance as such.

Mike Rice, Rutgers and “Homophobia”


If Rice was hurling non-homosexual slur ridden abuse would it have been less offensive to those who are centering their criticisms of Rice/Rutgers on the homosexual agenda?

The abuse is the problem. Whether it was insults laced with racial slurs, homosexual slurs or no slurs, the abuse was still the problem.

A slur is a slur is a slur. Who cares if it was the use of the word “faggot” or if was calling them “losers” or “sorry fucks.” He was abusing the kids. Flying balls. No one who isn’t gay is affected by homosexual slurs.

Honestly, when I have been called a faggot, I’ve never thought that the person was saying that I was homosexual. Faggot is not really a slur if one is not homosexual. Only homosexuals are sensitive to the word.

And it’s only really an insult worthy of note in America or to homosexuals outside of America who are overly attuned to American slang.

I understand that there are folks out there who fear homosexuals.  That said, how does Rice calling someone a “faggot” equal a homophobic slur.  Homophobia is a fear of homosexuals or homosexuality.  Not everyone who has a problem with homosexuality are fearful of homosexuality or being/becoming homosexual.

Aside from that, I’ve had occasion to hang out with homosexuals on occasion.  They aren’t always exactly hetero-friendly.  Once they accept you, you are welcomed in but there is always an element of distrust.  Are these folks heterophobic.  Is this phobic activity acceptable.  I’ve heard homosexuals speak of heteros as if they were all dogs.

All of this politically correct nonsense has to go.

Mike Rice was fined 50,000 dollars, lost income due to the three game suspension, was ordered to take “sensitivity training” which is punishment in and of itself.  I’ve never had a problem with homosexuals, never had an incident which would have caused me to be ordered into training, yet, I’ve had to suffer through sensitivity training mandated by several companies for which I’ve worked.  This training makes my eyes want to explode with it’s inanity.  I don’t feel anything towards homosexuals usually.  When I’m forced to attend one of these sensitivity training sessions, I start to loathe everyone including homosexuals.

I don’t care if you are Gay, Lesbian, Bi-Sexual or Transexual.  Your gender or choice of gender or choice of sexual partner is beside the point for me.  My question is are you a decent human being.  Everything else is eyewash.  BUT!  LGBT folks can not force themselves on to the world.  People aren’t going to be more likely to love you because they’ve attended training or because they’ve been mandated by a corporation or government to love you.

It has been less than 20 years that homosexuality has come into the mainstream.  There are folks who are going to die having never accepted that homosexuality is anything other than a sin.  Sorry, but, that is the reality of the world we live in.

You can vote.  Soon, that ridiculous DOMA garbage is going to be tossed aside with the bigots who created it.  Homosexuality is becoming more and more accepted as normal.  And that is the key.  Not to be tolerated by to be accepted.  Tolerance is idiotic.  It’s basically a person saying; “I can’t stand you, I abhor everything that you stand for, but, because I wish to fit int, I will tolerate you.”  The better plane of existence is when people say, “I accept you.  You are different from me and that is ok.”

Tolerance begets Sandy Hooks and Columbines.  That’s what tolerance gets you.  It’s a bunch of folks living side by side that can barely tolerate each other and only do so until they explode.  Tolerance is unhealthy.  Tolerance means that you do not accept differences.  You simply TOLERATE them.  The people who developed the concept of tolerance deserve a special place in hell (if it existed…which it doesn’t but that’s ok, too).

I know people who think I am sinning because I date women outside of my race.  I am race polluting to these people.  As strange as it sounds to me, I can’t change their ideology.  It’s the future generations who will decide the outcome of these hotly debated issues.

Homophobia is a misnomer.  Most people do not fear homosexuality.  They think it’s wrong.  It’s 2,000 plus years of religious ideology that is the challenge.

Political correctness is part of the problem.  Tolerance of outdated ideas side by side with supposed enlightened ideas.  How does that work?  We are supposed to accept Islam and Christianity which both state that homosexuality is a sin, an abomination while simultaneously we are supposed to accept homosexuality.

I have no problem accepting homosexuality.  It’s been with us since the beginning of time.  If it wasn’t around in Biblical times, it would not have been written about and prohibited.  The mere fact that it was prohibited because it was a religious rite of another God is proof that it has been with humanity for eons.  How can something that has persisted in human culture be unnatural.  It’s impossible.

The Greeks, Romans, Persians — all practitioners of homosexuality.  All accepted homosexual behaviors as part of the norm.

Not until Rome was Christianized did homosexuality as abomination become a primary theme in human consciousness.

Yet, again, we are supposed to tolerate both Christianity and Homosexuality.  No wonder people are confused.

Either Islam and Christianity are wrong or homosexuality is wrong.  Both can not be correct.

As for me, I think homosexuality is natural.  Some people are simply born with that “gene” or characteristic.  I’m sticking with that.

As for the word “faggot,” homosexuals need to give it up.  I hear homosexuals calling each other fags all the time.  “Oh Johnny, you’re such a fag.”   Let a heterosexual person say it and it’s similar to a White person uttering the word “nigger.”  People lose their minds.

End the word.  Stop referring to each other as fag.  Then you can talk to me about saying’ “that’s fucking gay.”

Gay, queer, fag — all of these words have evolved from usage and meaning to different usage and meaning over the past hundred years.  Let them evolve again.

Queer — Strange, weird, also homosexual.

Gay — Happy, also homosexual.

Fag — to tire or grow weary, cigarette (UK), also homosexual.

The Homosexual community does not own these words.  They do not have a monopoly on these words.

Much like quasi-illiterate people over-reacted to the word “niggardly” when used in a speech.

Get over yourselves.  Homosexuals have gained a level of support and relative normality that they haven’t enjoyed since Alexander the Great was sexing up his palace guard.  Look around.

Many people see homosexuality as a non-issue these days.  Of course, there are folks who still have a negative view of homosexuality.  It’s a hotly debated issue at times.

Stop trying to be a special class of people.  Stop trying to be a protected class of people.

Homosexuals aren’t special.  They’re just people who differ from the boring mainstream of life.  Maintain your originality.  Maintain your uniqueness.  Stop trying to become a special,protected class.  You aren’t that damn special.  And if you want people to NOT use homosexual centered slurs, stop using “hetero” as a slur.  Respect runs both ways.

Here’s the thing.  I know homosexuals who just live normal lives.  They don’t hide the fact that they are gay but they act like it doesn’t matter.  They have no need to feel special and feel no need to hide their homosexuality.  I accept that and love that attitude.  I’m straight.  I feel no need to flaunt it and do not feel special because I’m straight or hetero.  I don’t feel that I’m better than a guy or gal who is homosexual.    Point blank, I don’t give a damn one way or the other.  Are you a decent person?  That’s what matters.  If you are homosexual and a bad person, you’re still a bad person.  If you are homosexual and you are a decent person, you’re a decent person.  It doesn’t make you special.  It makes you a decent person.  Likewise, with heterosexual persons.  It all sounds so obvious.

Mike Rice acted like a buffoon.  True.  It can not be denied.  More than likely, it never

Fire this guy, too.

Fire this guy, too.

occurred to him that calling someone a “faggot” was a “homophobic slur.”  Everyone deserves a second chance, a chance at redemption.  Even folks who use the word “faggot.”  He was abusive.  THAT WAS THE ISSUE.  That he used the word “faggot” should have been beside the point but that is nearly all that I’ve heard.  As if that was the cardinal sin.  Punching kids, throwing balls at their heads, shoving them, grabbing them in choke holds — none of that seems to matter.  The criticism centers on his use of the word “faggot.”  He used more abusive terminology.  I distinctly heard and saw his lips forming the word “motherfucker” numerous times.  That’s a greater insult than the word “faggot” any day of the week.  Call someone a motherfucker in Afghanistan and you’d best be prepared to defend your life.

However, the only word that seemed to matter was “faggot.”  The act that is central to the hue and cry, the uproar and the outrage is the “homophobic” slur.

What is that?  Are we insane?  It’s almost as if it was of no consequence that balls were bouncing off of heads constantly in that video.  One ball seemed to slam into a kids face.  No one seems to be too upset about that….it’s all the word “faggot” that is causing the rage.  This nation is insane.

And then there is Tom Pernetti.  Firing Tom Pernetti was/is inexcusable.  They guy, reportedly, made one mistake and that mistake was not being sensitive enough of the gay community.  It is inexcusable that his career at Rutgers was sunk over that single issue.  The Gay Community should be ashamed of their behavior.  He went with legal consensus and had the approval of the University President who, apparently, could not be bothered until months later to actually watch the video that brought all of this insanity to the light of day.

We sacrificed a seemingly good guy who gave up millions for this job to political correctness, tolerance and a Salem-like witch hunt.

If Pernettis is out, Robert Barchi should be out.

What’s next?  A national register of convicted homophobes?

Register your child molesters, domestic abusers and homophobic slur users.  Oh yeah, don’t forget to register your gun owners, too.

Surely. the apocalypse is upon us.  I find this intolerable.

Afghanistan ~ Pushtoon Culture, Pedophilia and Homosexuality

The “chaste and glorious” love of the Pushtoon version of Islam. Kuni Bacha!

Afghan Men Struggle With Sexual Identity, Study Finds

An unclassified study from a military research unit in southern Afghanistan details how homosexual behavior is unusually common among men in the large ethnic group known as Pashtuns — though they seem to be in complete denial about it.

As if U.S. troops and diplomats didn’t have enough to worry about in trying to understand Afghan culture, a new report suggests an entire region in the country is coping with a sexual identity crisis.

An unclassified study from a military research unit in southern Afghanistan details how homosexual behavior is unusually common among men in the large ethnic group known as Pashtuns — though they seem to be in complete denial about it.

The study, obtained by Fox News, found that Pashtun men commonly have sex with other men, admire other men physically, have sexual relationships with boys and shun women both socially and sexually — yet they completely reject the label of “homosexual.” The research was conducted as part of a longstanding effort to better understand Afghan culture and improve Western interaction with the local people.

The research unit, which was attached to a Marine battalion in southern Afghanistan, acknowledged that the behavior of some Afghan men has left Western forces “frequently confused.”

The report details the bizarre interactions a U.S. Army medic and her colleagues had with Afghan men in the southern province of Kandahar.

In one instance, a group of local male interpreters had contracted gonorrhea anally but refused to believe they could have contracted it sexually — “because they were not homosexuals.”

Apparently, according to the report, Pashtun men interpret the Islamic prohibition on homosexuality to mean they cannot “love” another man — but that doesn’t mean they can’t use men for “sexual gratification.”

The group of interpreters who had contracted gonorrhea joked in the camp that they actually got the disease by “mixing green and black tea.” But since they refused to heed the medics’ warnings, many of them re-contracted the disease after receiving treatment.

The U.S. army medic also told members of the research unit that she and her colleagues had to explain to a local man how to get his wife pregnant.

This lovely young girl is unclean? According to the Pushtoon version of Islam she is. Amazing!

The report said: “When it was explained to him what was necessary, he reacted with disgust and asked, ‘How could one feel desire to be with a woman, who God has made unclean, when one could be with a man, who is clean? Surely this must be wrong.'”

The Pashtun populations are concentrated in the southern and eastern parts of the country. The Human Terrain Team that conducted the research is part of a military effort to learn more about local populations.

The report also detailed a disturbing practice in which older “men of status” keep young boys on hand for sexual relationships. One of the country’s favorite sayings, the report said, is “women are for children, boys are for pleasure.”

The report concluded that the widespread homosexual behavior stems from several factors, including the “severe segregation” of women in the society and the “prohibitive” cost of marriage.

Though U.S. troops are commonly taught in training for Afghanistan that the “effeminate characteristics” of Pashtun men are “normal” and not an indicator of homosexuality, the report said U.S. forces should not “dismiss” the unique version of homosexuality that is actually practiced in the region “out of desire to avoid western discomfort.”

Otherwise, the report said, Westerners could “risk failing to comprehend an essential social force underlying Pashtun culture.”

Mullah Omar ~ Boy Bugger Extraordinaire

Fortunately, I work in a predominantly Tajik area.  The Tajiks call these little boy buggers “Qandaharis.”  Because they say that all of the men down in the Southeast love to capture little boys and keep them for sex (I cleaned that up.  They’re much more graphic about it).  It’s pretty much common knowledge here.  The Pashtuns may be in denial about it, but, the Tajiks aren’t and  make fun of them all the time.

The call them all kuni bacha’a which pretty much translates to “boy buggers.”  lol

Not news to me.  lol

The Egyptians say the same thing about the Arabs of Saudi Arabia and Kuwait.  Isn’t Saddam famous for having made a similar statement about Saudi Arabia.

Aside from that, anal sex is pretty common in the lands of Islam because of the importance of female virginity.  The vagina must be pristine with hymen intact at the time of  marriage.  Apparently, though, the anal cavity and sphincter muscle can worn to hell and back.  lol

Hooking up for Man Love Thursday!

What a strange bunch.  It’s Arab culture.  The Pashtuns are more heavily influenced by the Arabs.  The Tajiks are influenced more by China, Asia and Russia.

I’m going to show this to my terps.  They’ll laugh their butts off.

Of course, they’re all Tajik.

Here’s an interesting link for additional information.