Jack Dorsey is a Fascist

social media censorshipm 480Apparently, if one is famous one can issue actual threats of violence and death in Twitter.com.

If one is not so famous, one must kowtow to the fascist dictatorship of Jack Dorsey and his minions.

My account at Twitter was suspended because I told the totalitarian turds in power in Iran that I hoped that they were next. Dorsey loves his mass murderers, dictators, religious fascists and terror lords. Dorsey hates freedom of expression.

Dorsey should move to Iran or China. He will fit right in.

May he burn in the Islamic Hell.

Screen Shot 2020-01-08 at 5.59.44 AM

jd antifa

Coincidentally, he dresses like an Antifa coward.

 

Perspective on People and their Scribblings

051794ee6dc54b3232750912eb467f8dbad845-wm

From my experience, one can take anyone from before the Politically Correct era of 2000 Forward and call them a bigot based on their writings. It doesn’t matter who we’re discussing. Even today, one can find bigotry in nearly anyone’s writings. If you one wishes to dismiss the ideas or writing of any person because of that one aspect, one would wind up dismissing nearly the whole of humanity. From W.E.B. Dubois to George Washington to Ronald Reagan to Bill Clinton, every last person who has put thought to paper has written something that is or could be construed as racist and will be construed as racist or bigoted by future generations. This is especially so with the current hyper-sensitive generation of Liberal.

If one wishes to seriously discuss a person or a social issue, one must take the whole of a person and the whole of the body of writing or work into consideration. Short slices or quotes from persons are excellent for memes and deconstruction of selected persons. However, this never gives a true and satisfying window into the soul of the person whom one is attempting to understand.
If character assassination is the goal, memes and selected quotes/slices without context are excellent weapons. Yet, they only serve to distort and distract.
Hillary can be made to look the fool if we take selected comments and opinions. Even Einstein can be made to look the dithering fool using his words detached from context against him.
images-1 (1)
Noam Chomsky is an especially dissected author and thought leader. If one takes only Chomsky as critic of Israel, one can make the man out to be a supporter of Islamic Tyranny. If one takes only his views of Vietnam or Cambodia into consideration, one could make Chomsky out to be a supporter of genocide and communist tyranny. Yet, if one reads the whole of his works and uses an overview thereof, one can see that Chomsky is a great critic of Imperialism as a whole. His views are as valid if not more so than many others of his generations and this one.
To know and understand a person from history, one must know the whole of the life not selected pieces of that life which are pulled out selectively with an agenda.

Jefferson can seem a genius or a racist crackpot depending on the level of knowledge of the man. Ceaser can seem the despot or the liberator. There is not a human being who has tread across the globe who cannot be made to seem monster or hero depending upon which work or word one chooses to use in support of one’s views.

04feef30f50925846501f8a015a3d0979332a9-wm (1) 55baa73b511853e379be328880cafed5

RETARDED and the Liberal Narrative Control Aspirations (Political Correctness)

10577201_793475214030538_1536521777123789465_n

Retarded is a valid word.

What is better about the word “challenged?”

One should not call this girl “retarded” but her mental capacity is retarded.

Retarded means less advanced in mental, physical, or social development than is usual for one’s age.

It also means foolish or stupid.

It’s all about context.

In point of fact, this little gal is “retarded” as she is less advanced in mental, physical or social development than is usual for one who is her age.

Retarded is a word. Words are assigned value by humans who create them and use them. The mere fact that one person uses the word in a derogatory manner does not mean that the use of the word is universally derogative in nature.

However, the insistence by the Left to assign permanent value to language is a bit of a sign of their cultural and societal retardation.

Language evolves. Constantly. Language is nearly always in flux.

The word “Ball” is perfectly illustrative of this phenomenon.

Ball has been used over the centuries to denote:

1. A round or other shaped object used in playing games.

2. An organized dance or other social gathering.

3. Fun or having fun

4. The act of playing basketball well.

I am certain there are more examples that I could use here.

In short, get over it liberals. Words are words. They have only the power that we assign them. Liberals are all too eager to assign to words some negative connotation and to thrust that definition on to society as a means of forcing conversations and controlling the narrative. We need no new victims. We need empowered humans who aren’t afraid to face the world.