Posts Tagged ‘Obama’
Obama Punching Bag
In thinking out loud on February 4, 2012 at 12:26 pmWarren Buffet on the Deficit
In Politics, Quotes, thinking out loud on July 28, 2011 at 3:40 pm“The threat of force lies behind every tax dollar the government collects.”
— Gene Healy
Cherish public credit. One method of preserving it is to use it as sparingly as possible, avoiding occasions of expense by cultivating peace…avoiding likewise the accumulation of debt.
— George Washington
“The only difference between government and gangsters is your opinion.”
– Chris Lyspooner
Shadow War against al Qaeda
In Afghanistan, islam, Middle East, Military, Politics, Religion, Stupidity, thinking out loud, War on October 20, 2010 at 12:01 am
I disagree with waging this “Shadow War” against al Qaeda.
Announce to the world that it is our intention to destroy al Qaeda. They attacked our Nation. They declared War. We did not. This is the War desired by Osama bin Laden and his motley crue of Wahhabist thieves, cuthroats and murderers. They wanted it. They got it.
Announce that we will strike al Qaeda wherever they exist. Wherever they hide. In any hole. On any mountain. On any sea. In any place where al Qaeda deems it necessary to plant a parasitic, violent bud, we shall strike to root it out before it takes root.
Announce that if al Qaeda is allowed to plant operatives or to exist unmolested by the local populace, said populace will be accountable for the actions of al Qaeda and said population will be accountable for any and all deaths resulting from al Qaeda and their brothers and sisters. The fault lies with the folks who cooperate with al Qaeda.
Tell the NGOs and Humitarian Organizations of whatever stripe that we do no hold ourselves accountable for the deaths surrnouding al Qaeda. Whether it be bullets, cluster bombs or fragments of US munitions or suicide vests and IEDs from insurgents or al Qaeda operatives.
We did not want this war. Nevertheless, we have it. We intend to prosecute the war to it’s conclusion. The conclusion is the destruction of al Qaeda and it’s subordinate and parallel organizaations in whatever part of the world it may exist.
After that announcement is made, we, The United States of America, should bomb the Nejd and every place sacred to the Wahhabis. We should invade Saudi Arabia and hold Mekkah hostage all the while allowing the Hajj to continue unmolested. Circulate rumours that we have planted a nuclear device under the Ka’aba along with the intent to detonate said device should a strike occur on US soil.
Also, we should pull out all military resources that protect or support or otherwise maintains the power of any Islamic despot. From Cairo to Iraq and Afghanistan. Tell the people of the Islamic World that their governance is now up to them. If they show that they are worthy and willing to fight for Democracy and their share of the delights of Liberty and Freedom that we will at a time, deemed opportune to us, intercede on their behalf. We will support no country that has as a defining point in their National Statement or

beliefs the destruction of Israel or any other Democracy. Period. We will support no Nation that has as part of it’s Constitiution
Immediately halt all support for Pakistan, Afghanistan and Iraq until they actually come on line with a WESTERN AGENDA as opposed to an Islamist agenda. I would like to end all support of Islamic Countries period. I would include the protection of their shipping on the sea lanes. Let Iran fight it out with the Sunnis and afterward step in to pick up the pieces. These parties would slaughter each other. The West should precipitate such a crisis and then step in and pick up the pieces after they’ve murdered 2/3rds of each others populations.
Shariah Law. We will support no Nation which has as part of it’s national belief system the enslavement or disenfranchisement of minorities or women.
After this, we strike out at al Qaeda wherever they surface. If locals are killed. It is their fault for not having rooted out al Qaeda or for having allowed al Qaeda to plant roots.
Eventually, they’ll get the message. If al Qaeda is there, missiles will rain down in holy terror. If no al Qaeda is there, no missiles will arrinve.
We must halt our support of terrorising despots. We must support freedom and liberty. We must defeat al Qaeda.
As of now, we are losing this war. Especially when we allow them to plant their seeds of terror in our own front yard.




Shadow War
In Afghanistan, islam, Middle East, Military, Religion, War on August 16, 2010 at 6:21 pmObama and the US Sabre Rattling over Iranian Nukes
In Middle East, Military, Politics, thinking out loud, Useful Information, War on July 17, 2010 at 12:01 am
Gates is sounding more belligerent these days. “I don’t think we’re prepared to even talk about containing a nuclear Iran,” he told Fox News on June 20. “We do not accept the idea of Iran having nuclear weapons.” In fact, Gates was reflecting a new reality in the military and intelligence communities. Diplomacy and economic pressure remain the preferred means to force Iran to negotiate a nuclear deal, but there isn’t much hope that’s going to happen. “Will [sanctions] deter them from their ambitions with regards to nuclear capability?” CIA Director Leon Panetta told ABC News on June 27. “Probably not.” So the military option is very much back on the table.
What has changed? “I started to rethink this last November,” a recently retired U.S. official with extensive knowledge of the issue told me. “We offered the Iranians a really generous deal, which their negotiators accepted,” he went on, referring to the offer to exchange Iran’s 1.2 tons of low-enriched uranium (3.5% pure) for higher-enriched (20%) uranium for medical research and use. “When the leadership shot that down, I began to think, Well, we made the good-faith effort to engage. What do we do now?”
But it is also possible that the saber-rattling is not a bluff, that the U.S. really won’t tolerate a nuclear Iran and is prepared to do something awful to stop it.
Read more: http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,2003921,00.html#ixzz0tmPRNrwm
What’s more awful?
A nuclear Iran or someone stopping it.
If Jordan, Egypt, Saudi Arabia and the UAE want Iranian Nuke Programs stopped, why don’t they come out and straightforward ask for it.
I can see why they’re scared. Iran is more likely to use it against them than us.
Saudi could bring China on board.
We should arrange a deal. Cheap oil in exchange for a strike. Also, we should make them make peace and I mean real peace with Israel in exchange for a strike against Iran and we should make them disown Wahhabism.
1. Cheap Oil
2. Peace with Israel
3. Crush Wahhabism and become Sufi Muslim
4. They have to bring China in on it. China must invade Iran.
lol
Potentially, we have the Middle East by the balls with this Iranian thing. Only if we use it correctly.

The Muslim World
In Afghanistan, Central Asia, culture, Introduction, islam, Middle East, Military, Religion, Spirituality, Stupidity, thinking out loud on June 23, 2010 at 12:01 am
I like this. Except that I don't see any of them as scary. I see those labeled as scary as folks who need to be dealt with violently. Not all, but, those who would act violently against US.
On the Muslim World
Muslims see themselves as a community. They always have and always will. The only way to stop that is to kill all of them. Christians think of themselves as a community as well. Christendom is a concept only recently gone out of fashion. There are mentions of Christendom from the 19th Century, I know. Europe was still speaking of Christendom until only recently. I think Churchill mentions it a few times. That was the 20th Century. It is not a foreign concept to think in terms of a World Wide Religious or Cultural community. We think of the West. The West is Christian. No matter how greatly this is denied by atheists and secularists within the West. The West is merely a more secular term for Christendom. The West is as guilty of this kind of speak as is Islam. The difference is that we, in the West, agree with Western Culture. We don’t see it as problem and arrogantly believe that the rest of the World should be overjoyed to join us. Muslim lands. Christan lands. During World War I and at the end of World War I, “The West” celebrated the return of the “Holy Land” to it’s rightful Christian hands by virtue of it’s capture after the defeat of the Ottoman Empire. The Ottoman Empire encompassed most of what we now speak of as the Middle East. Iraq, Syria, Turkey, Palestine, Israel, Egypt, Lebanon, Jordan and a few others were
all part of the now defunct Ottoman Empire. This was considered the Muslim World or the Lands of the Mohamadens (Saracens) and spoken and written about as such by Christian or “Western” writers and historians. That some in our era do not understand the concept of Muslim lands is fairly meaningless. The Great Tides of History are against their ignorance. It’s simply that they are ignorant of the history of the region. Not their fault. Our schools are more interested in Political Correct thought processes than learning. If one truly desires to rail against this concept and this ideology, though, one should at least be aware of this history. Me, I don’t care what history says about Muslim lands. Prior to the Muslims, these lands were all Western (Roman) and/or Christian. Not that Christians ruled them justly either.
History also shows us that the most violent and war like culture wins out in the end. The winners determine the future and control history. Except in our current era, where idiotic pacifists, socialist, multi-culturalists and self defeatists in the West want to write history based strictly upon their feelings of guilt and ignorance of history. They remind me of mini-Pol Pot or Mao Tse Tung pretenders. The greatest threat to the West (Christendom) is not the Muslims or even Communist China. It is the 5th Column of corrupt leftists and extreme liberals within our own borders. In order to finally defeat the Islamic threat, we will need to defeat this 5th Column by making them irrelevant.




Voting Obama ~ What does it mean?
In Politics on June 19, 2010 at 12:01 am
I was recently asked if I wanted Obama to fail.
Though not a Republican, there are parts of the OBAMA Agenda that I most definitely want to see fail. I don’t like his domestic agenda all that much and I don’t particularly care for his desire to cede parts of US sovereignty over to the that den of thieves in the United Nations. So, yes, I want the Obama Agenda to fail, but, in no way do I wish for him to fail America. America can pass him like a bad gall stone. I fervently wish for this to happen in a most expeditious manner. Much like Carter before him, Obama needs to be a one term President.
He is a danger to America. This has nothing to do with his religion or his birth certificate. I think he’s scum. I liked Bill Clinton. I didn’t particularly care for all of the Clinton policies, but, Clinton seemed to me to be pro-America. He was a bit loose with our Country. Even so, I think he had her best interests in mind. I don’t feel that way about Obama. I feel Obama wants us to be liked more than anything else. Not respected. Not feared. Liked. That’s an assinine way to run foreign policy. Obama is weak and vacillating. He’s a pox upon the American house. We need a good vaccination.
Obama needs to be flushed. Period. Anyone stupid enough to vote for him in ’08. I give a pass. He talked a good game. By now, it is apparent that talk is all Obama will ever be. Vote for him in ’12 and, in my opinion, you are not a real American. You’re a Euro Trash wannabe. Move to Europe and leave America for Americans. The illegal immigrants belong here more than those who vote twice for Obama.
The DNC and Leftist Omni-Rebuttal for Obama
In Politics on May 28, 2010 at 2:17 am
Be careful out there.
If you aren’t an Obama Drone and you dare criticize an Obama move, you are an instant bigot.
They’ll pull the race card on you faster than Biden can make a gaff.
* Caveat — If you are a forwarder of racist or bigoted trash on the internet or if you are an actual bigot/racist, you deserve to be called out. You make the rest of us look bad.
US Policy in Afghanistan ~ Failure 101
In Afghanistan, Central Asia, islam, Middle East, Military, Politics, Quotes, Religion, Stupidity, thinking out loud on January 30, 2010 at 3:31 amJALALABAD, Afghanistan — The leaders of one of the largest Pashtun tribes in a stronghold said Wednesday that they had agreed to support the American-backed government, battle insurgents and burn down the home of any Afghan who harbored Taliban guerrillas.
Adam Ferguson for The New York TimesShinwari tribal elders meeting this week in Jalalabad, Afghanistan, established harsh penalties against Taliban sympathizers.
Shinwari elders united against the Taliban on Wednesday in a pact set in Jalalabad, Afghanistan.
Elders from the Shinwari tribe, which represents about 400,000 people in eastern Afghanistan also pledged to send at least one military-age male in each family to the Afghan Army or the police in the event of a Taliban attack.
In exchange for their support, American commanders agreed to channel $1 million in development projects directly to the tribal leaders and bypass the local Afghan government, which is widely seen as corrupt.
“The Taliban have been trying to destroy our tribe, and they are taking money from us, and they are taking our sons to fight,” said Malik Niaz, a Shinwari elder. “If they defy us now, we will defeat them.”
_________________________________________________________________________________________
This is a band aid. We are bandaging one wound to cover up a sucking chest wound that lies across the heart of Afghanistan and Central Asia.
We have not proven to be a friend to all of Afghanistan. We are seen as an occupying force to many Afghans.
With that in mind, I’m not surprised that it takes money and other inducements to obtain the loyalties of these people. Even after World War II, we purchased the loyalties of Europe via the Marshall Plan and other economic programs. There is no free lunch. We aren’t in Afghanistan simply to help the Afghan people. They know that. We know that. Everyone knows that except for brainless Americans who are half illiterate.
The taliban are still supported in the country side. Many Afghans thought that America was going to come in and introduce democratic reforms. We didn’t. We didn’t support democracy or democratic minded leaders. We came in and we supported Warlords and persons who had destroyed Afghanistan for their personal gain and to enhance their personal power.
With that in mind, how could we expect anything except the situation that we have at present. Karzai is beholden to the Warlords.
We pay taliban and warlords to NOT attack our convoys. When we do go into an area, we bring with us “collateral damage.” The Afghans see this. They don’t like it.
We pay off the very people against whom we are supposedly at war. We spent 2002-2008 and on to the present giving monies to Pakistan that we knew were being funneled to the extremists in the FATA and the NWFP. Yet, we continue the same failed policies. We refused to bring Musharaf to heel and instead poured money into his coffers. Even though, we knew that he was essentially hiding the very men for whom we “searched.”
We’ve not done our best. Sometimes, I think we’ve done our worst.
We’re told and it’s preached by locals that we should support our soldiers. Yet, our government engages in activities with persons and groups and strategies that ultimately lead to the deaths of our soldiers.
American leadership is confused and many individuals are confused about Afghanistan and the taliban. We are told that we are looking to make peace with “moderate” taliban. It’s like seeking a moderate serial killer.
The only way to defeat the taliban in my opinion is to go into the FATA and NWFP. That would put us at war with Pakistan. What would Pakistans reaction be to a full scale invasion of the FATA and NWFP.
My opinion is that it’s time to give Karzai an ultimatum.
He’s got 18 months to get his shit together or we are pulling out militarily.
Give the same ultimatum to the Warlords.
Tell them that if they want our support, they must play ball. They must go legit.
Produce a series of milestone. If they meet them, they get so much in return. If they don’t, they get nothing.
We’ve been dancing in circles with these murdering thieves long enough.
I see no strategic advantage to Afghanistan.
The real enemy is sitting in Pakistan and Saudi Arabia.
We sit in Afghanistan and Iraq.
We are insane.
We’re looking for a Unicorn to solve our problems when the beasts that attack us sit in plain site in Golden Palaces built with Black Gold.




President Obama to “Thank” Cats on “Hoops for Haiti”
In Quotes, Spirituality, Sports, thinking out loud, UK Basketball on January 26, 2010 at 9:25 pm
Kentucky is getting all the great press lately.
Unanimous #1 College Basketball Team in the Nation.
Cousins, Patterson and Wall ~ One of them is either Player or Frosh of the Week almost every week of this season.
Wall and Patterson are front runners for National Player of the Year.
Wall is frontrunner for SEC Player of the Year.
Cal puts together “Hoops for Haiti” on a moments notice. He and the Cats raise over 1,000,000 USD in less than a week.
Now, the President of the United States of America wants to thank them for their efforts. Put aside politics for a moment and hear those words. THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS GOING TO THANK THE CATS! This is an honor of the highest order. It matters not whether you voted for the man or not. He’s the President. He is the human embodiment of the Nation. He wants to either meet with the Cats or in some manner convey his and the nations appreciation for their efforts.
Aside from the honor associated with receiving this magnanimous gesture, it’s publicity of the highest order. This is a publicity bonanza.
Coach Cal is a master. I’m not saying that he did this for the press that it’s garnered. It doesn’t matter. What matters is that the University of Kentucky is getting a public lift that is amazing in scale. It’s unbelievable what Coach Cal has done.
I have to admire the man.
He’s amazing.
UK has not seen this kind of public adulation since…well, not in my memory.
Congratulations Coach Cal and to the Cats are in order. This is incredible. I love it.
It’s awesome to be a Cat fan right now and to be associated with this incredible team and its Coach.
GO BIG BLUE!
Contracting “US Companies” in Afghanistan
In Afghanistan, Commerce, Humor, Military, Politics, Stupidity on November 19, 2009 at 12:17 pmUS Contract Companies are hiring 15 to 20 Third Country Nationals (Indians, Filipinos, etc) for every one American in Afghanistan. 10% of Americans out of work and DynCorps, Fluor, CACI, AECOM, KBR and all of these other “American” International Contract companies aren’t interested in hiring any of them. Maybe they’ll hire some illegal immigrants as well.
They are keeping their bottom line in check with these moves. Making millions of dollars in profit by stiffing the American worker. DynCorps, KBR and Fluor can hire 20 Indians for the cost of hiring one US Citizen. The US Government is awarding these multi-million dollar contracts to these “American” companies and they here 80-90 percent foreign employees.
What I think is even more humorous is that the US Government is making this concerted effort to break up large contracts such as the KBR LOGCAP II contract as well as others. There are very few companies that can handle the logistics of these operations. What ends up happening is that Company A wins the contract from the US government. Company A then subcontracts to KBR (or whatever company) or a subsidiary of KBR. The same company winds up with all of the contracts that they had before. The difference is that there is now a middle man. It’s all a shell game. I guess Congress and the average American out there are idiots and are fooled by all of this muddling of facts and actions.
Another thing that Company B (KBR) does is form another company/corporation. It looks like a separate company on paper but it’s indirectly owned by the same people. They even hire the same folks from earlier contracts to run them. Same PM, same DPM, same cast and crew. On the surface, a new company is in business and winning contracts. In reality, it’s the same group of folks making the same money.
And it’s easy to see. Easy to investigate, but, the US government is too lazy or incompetent to see the obvious. I’ve been laughing for 5 years. Same crooks winning the same contracts and the same Congress and DOD/DOS getting scammed for more and more tax dollars.
Fools!
It’s been the same story since at least World War II. I bet that some of these companies can be traced back to the War between the States. The US Government never learns. They just open that check book and sign more checks.
No, I’m not a disgruntled employee or former employee. Most of my contract work requires that I am a US citizenship. This doesn’t affect me and never will.
Separatists and Ethnic Minorities Unite!!!
In Middle East, Military, Politics on March 2, 2009 at 9:54 pm

I think that the UN should hire consultants from HAMAS, al Qaeda and Hezbollah via Iran and Saudi Arabia to teach the Kurds and Tibetans, etc how to shore up support for their quest to gain a Autonomy/Self rule.
I think terrorism is an excellent marketing strategy as evidenced by the Obama Plan for Gaza. It works. It worked for the the 13 Colonies that became the USA. it worked for Israel against the British Mandate. It is working for the Palestinian Gazans as we speak. (When is the last time that you heard anyone in serious discussion about the West Bank?) It will work forever as most people don’t have the stomach for conflict. It’s a world of wusses especially in this modern age and gloriously more so in the West. We like to style ourselves “enlightened” and “sophisticated.” Oh, oh, my my, aren’t we so.
No one cares about the Kurds now. But! If they start mass murdering innocent civilians in the major metropolitan areas of their oppressor nations (Iran/Iraq/Turkey) and in third party countries such as the US and across Europe, I think that ground support across the globe would swell.
And by all means, they should blame all of their troubles on the West in general and America specifically. As this will certainly enhance their efforts to gain credibility and generate cash flow from the gullible masses of Europe and America.
Thoughts?
I think it’s the wave of the future.
I may have to write a book about this. Encourage it along.
![]()


Out of Iraq By August 2010
In Middle East, Military, Politics, thinking out loud on February 26, 2009 at 10:54 pm
Obama Favoring Mid-2010 Pullout In Iraq, Aides Say (New York Times, Feb. 25, 2009, Pg. 1) President Obama is nearing a decision that would order American combat forces out of Iraq by August 2010, senior administration officials said, as he seeks to finally end a war that has consumed and polarized the United States for nearly six years. The timetable would give the military three months more to withdraw than the 16-month pullout Obama promised last year on the campaign trail. Officials said Obama was prepared to make that shift because he agreed with the concerns of ground commanders who want more time to cement security gains, strengthen political institutions and make sure Iraq does not become more unstable again. Even with the withdrawal order, Obama plans to leave behind a “residual force” of tens of thousands of troops to continue training Iraqi security forces, hunt down foreign terrorist cells and guard American institutions, as he said he would during last year’s campaign. Obama Expected to Set Date for Iraq Pullout August 2010 is Likely Decision, Three Months Later Than Pledged in Campaign (Washington Post, Feb. 25, 2009, Pg. 4) President Obama is expected to announce as early as Friday that he will remove all U.S. combat troops from Iraq by August 2010, three months later than promised during his campaign, U.S. officials said. Obama has not made a final decision on the matter, but it could come during a trip to give a speech in North Carolina on Friday, the officials said. The withdrawal timetable of about 19 months was one of several options outlined for Obama by Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Michael Mullen, including a faster schedule of 16 months and a slower plan of 23 months, one official said. “The risks are different with each option, and there are pros and cons of each one,” he said.
I absolutely agree with this. It’s time to get out. We’ve been wasting too much money on this place. Too much time and money. It’s time to prove to the world what we said. Restore a semi-Democracy and get out. It also proves that many of the most cynical Americans and other critics of the war were wrong. We took out Saddam. Helped to secure and started the rebuilding effort. We are leaving the country to the Iraqis now. It’s up to them to become an upstanding member of the international community. Islam and terrorism can be no excuse. They either stand or fall based upon their actions.
It’s time for America to leave Iraq to the Iraqis…



Bush Hate, Obama Euphoria
In Politics on February 1, 2009 at 2:24 amBush Hatred and Obama Euphoria Are Two Sides of the Same Coin
Consequently, though Bush hatred may weaken as the 43rd president minds his business back home in Texas, and while Obama euphoria may fade as the 44th president is compelled to immerse himself in the daunting ambiguities of power, our universities will continue to educate students to believe that hatred and euphoria reflect political wisdom. Urgent though the problem is, not even the efficient and responsible spending of a $1 trillion stimulus package would begin to address it.
By PETER BERKOWITZ
Now that George W. Bush has left the harsh glare of the White House and Barack Obama has settled into the highest office in the land, it might be reasonable to suppose that Bush hatred and Obama euphoria will begin to subside. Unfortunately, there is good reason to doubt that the common sources that have nourished these dangerous political passions will soon lose their potency.
At first glance, Bush hatred and Obama euphoria could not be more different. Hatred of Mr. Bush went well beyond the partisan broadsides typical of democratic politics. For years it disfigured its victims with open, indeed proud, loathing for the very manner in which Mr. Bush walked and talked. It compelled them to denounce the president and his policies as not merely foolish or wrong or contrary to the national interest, but as anathema to everything that made America great.
In contrast, the euphoria surrounding Mr. Obama’s run for president conferred upon the candidate immunity from criticism despite his newness to national politics and lack of executive experience, and regardless of how empty his calls for change. At the same time, it inspired those in its grips, repeatedly bringing them tears of joy throughout the long election season. With Mr. Obama’s victory in November and his inauguration last week, it suffused them with a sense that not only had the promise of America at last been redeemed but that the world could now be transfigured.
In fact, Bush hatred and Obama euphoria — which tend to reveal more about those who feel them than the men at which they are directed — are opposite sides of the same coin. Both represent the triumph of passion over reason. Both are intolerant of dissent. Those wallowing in Bush hatred and those reveling in Obama euphoria frequently regard those who do not share their passion as contemptible and beyond the reach of civilized discussion. Bush hatred and Obama euphoria typically coexist in the same soul. And it is disproportionately members of the intellectual and political class in whose souls they flourish.
To be sure, democratic debate has always been a messy affair in which passion threatens to overwhelm reason. So long as citizens remain free and endowed with a diversity of interests and talents, it will remain so.
In October 1787, amid economic crisis and widespread fears about the new nation’s ability to defend itself, Alexander Hamilton, in the first installment of what was to become the Federalist Papers, surveyed the formidable obstacles to giving the newly crafted Constitution a fair hearing. Some would oppose it, Hamilton observed, out of fear that ratification would diminish their wealth and power. Others would reject it because they hoped to profit from the political disarray that would ensue. The opposition of still others was rooted in “the honest errors of minds led astray by preconceived jealousies and fears.”
Indeed, the best of men, Hamilton acknowledged, were themselves all-too-vulnerable to forming ill-considered political opinions: “So numerous indeed and so powerful are the causes, which serve to give a false bias to the judgment, that we upon many occasions, see wise and good men on the wrong as well as on the right side of questions, of the first magnitude to society.”
In surveying the impediments to bringing reason to bear in politics, it was not Hamilton’s aim to encourage despair over democracy’s prospects but to refine political expectations. “This circumstance, if duly attended to,” he counseled, “would furnish a lesson of moderation to those, who are ever so much persuaded of their being in the right, in any controversy.”
As Hamilton would have supposed, the susceptibility of political judgment to corruption by interest and ambition is as operative in our time as it was in his. What has changed is that those who, by virtue of their education and professional training, would have once been the first to grasp Hamilton’s lesson of moderation are today the leading fomenters of immoderation.
Bush hatred and Obama euphoria are particularly toxic because they thrive in and have been promoted by the news media, whose professional responsibility, it has long been thought, is to gather the facts and analyze their significance, and by the academy, whose scholarly training, it is commonly assumed, reflects an aptitude for and dedication to systematic study and impartial inquiry.
From the avalanche of vehement and ignorant attacks on Bush v. Gore and the oft-made and oft-refuted allegation that the Bush administration lied about WMD in Iraq, to the remarkable lack of interest in Mr. Obama’s career in Illinois politics and the determined indifference to his wrongness about the surge, wide swaths of the media and the academy have concentrated on stoking passions rather than appealing to reason.
Some will speculate that the outbreak of hatred and euphoria in our politics is the result of the transformation of left-liberalism into a religion, its promulgation as dogma by our universities, and students’ absorption of their professors’ lesson of immoderation. This is unfair to religion.
At least it’s unfair to those forms of biblical faith that teach that God’s ways are hidden and mysterious, that all human beings are both deserving of respect and inherently flawed, and that it is idolatry to invest things of this world — certainly the goods that can be achieved through politics — with absolute value. Through these teachings, biblical faith encourages skepticism about grand claims to moral and political authority and an appreciation of the limits of one’s knowledge, both of which well serve liberal democracy.
In contrast, by assembling and maintaining faculties that think alike about politics and think alike that the university curriculum must instill correct political opinions, our universities cultivate intellectual conformity and discourage the exercise of reason in public life. It is not that our universities invest the fundamental principles of liberalism with religious meaning — after all the Declaration of Independence identifies a religious root of our freedom and equality. Rather, they infuse a certain progressive interpretation of our freedom and equality with sacred significance, zealously requiring not only outward obedience to its policy dictates but inner persuasion of the heart and mind. This transforms dissenters into apostates or heretics, and leaders into redeemers.
Mr. Berkowitz is a senior fellow at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution.
Please add your comments to the Opinion Journal forum
. Printed in The Wall Street Journal, page A11
and by copyright law. For non-personal use or to order multiple copies, please contact Dow Jones Reprints at 1-800-843-0008 or visit
This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement
Copyright 2008 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Liberals will deny this phenomenon. They pretend tolerance even as they attempt to censor the collective thought of the nation with their political correctness and similar intellectually empty and diseased philosophies.
President Obama
In Politics on November 4, 2008 at 2:11 pmOr President Obambi…or is that President Jimmy Carter II.
Today is the day that the people of America vote in the man who will ensure a Republican landslide in 2012. Good Job America. Reactive politics at it’s best. No plan. No real goal in mind. Just get rid of the last guy. The one good thing that will come of this is the race barrier has been broken. May it forever be laid aside.
Thus far, this hasn’t unified our nation but divided it more. I’ve heard the complaint that Black people are only voting or Obama because he’s black at least a thousand times. I’ve heard Black people say that White people are racist and won’t vote for Obama even though the fact is that without White voters Obama could not be elected. None of it makes any sense to me.
Both sides of the racial divide are stuck in the past and need to move on.
Obama will become President. He’ll raise taxes. He’ll attempt to pass a national Health Care plan. The Democrats will hold a majority in both houses. It will last until 2010. The excesses of the Democrats will ensure that.
Will Obama leave Iraq prematurely?
Will he “surge” in Afghanistan?
Will he hold Pakistan to their word?
Will he solve the Iran problem or exacerbate it in his naivite?
Will he strengthen the military and add Divisions or will he destroy it by maintaining a high optempo and downsizing simultaneously?
Will he raise taxes and push business out of the US?
Will the stock market crash further or will it start to mend and rise?
We shall see.










